The 2019 American Anthropology Master's Career Survey

Anthropology Master’s Reflections on Education, Careers, and Professional Organizations Then and Now

Executive Summary
In spring of 2019 the 2018 University of North Texas Master’s Cohort decided to replicate the AAA/CoPAPIA 2009 Anthropology MA Career survey in order to understand how career paths, reflections on education, and views on professional organizations of anthropology master’s graduates had changed over the past decade. The survey team collected a non-random sample of 850 valid survey responses from the primary respondent group: those holding a master’s degree in anthropology who received this degree in 2018 or earlier from a North American institution. For some questions, we looked at the differences in the responses of anthropologists who indicated they work at an academic institution and those who do not (applied or practicing anthropologists).

Key Findings – Assessments of Educational Programs and Experiences

Feeling that a graduate degree would enhance general career choices more than a BA/BS was the most agreed upon reason for pursuing a graduate education. The second most common reason for pursuing a graduate education was because participants were seeking the education/training for a specific job or career.
The majority (81%) of respondents felt that their degree prepared them either “well” or “very well” for their career choice. Applied anthropologists are slightly less likely to feel their degree prepared them for their career, but still have high agreement with the statement.
When asked about overall satisfaction with their education, the majority of respondents were satisfied (“very satisfied” + “somewhat satisfied”) with every component, although in no component were a majority of participants “very satisfied” with their education. The main complaint about master’s education was that it does not give students relevant skills to enter the workforce. This is a trend that continues from the 2009 AAA/CoPAPIA results.
Although most respondents indicated that if given the chance, they would earn their anthropology master’s degree again because of the intellectual and professional fulfillment, several mentioned they would look into different schools or into different courses of study within anthropology.
When asked about different master’s program components, such as classroom experience and thesis research, field research opportunities and thesis/research projects emerged as the most helpful components to respondents. The results of this question are consistent with those in 2009. Other helpful components participants elaborated on in an open-ended question were experience, networking, and support.

We asked participants to rate importance of different areas of the knowledge and training often included in master’s curricula:

Among research design and methodology components, qualitative research skills ranked highest (71%) compared to quantitative research skills (60%). Focus groups were ranked lowest (23%)
Among substantive/content area components, ethics competency training was ranked highest (60%), followed by policy/compliance foundations (51%). Historic preservation was ranked lowest (30%)
Among workplace preparation and application components, project design, development, and management was ranked highest (72%). Presentation skills (66%) and technical writing (65%) were also considered important. IRB experience or training ranked lowest (30%).
Participants ranked interviewing skills, ethnographic methods, case studies and readings, anthropological theory, and technical writing as less important (10% decrease or greater) than they did in 2009.
Conversely, they ranked job seeking skills and museum work as more important (10% increase or greater) than they did in 2009.

Key Findings – Master’s Career Pathways

68% of respondents strongly or somewhat agreed that their anthropology master’s degree was instrumental in their job offer. Of notable importance: 86% of respondents strongly or somewhat agreed that skills learned outside of anthropology are significant to their current positions, with 68% strongly or somewhat agreeing that most of their current job skills were learned on-the-job.
Over half (58%) of respondents strongly or somewhat agreed that they identify themselves professionally as anthropologists most of the time.
We saw an increase in those employed full time between 2009 (40%) and 2019 (67%). As in 2009, the majority of participants had a permanent position (29%) as opposed to a contractual position (16%).
The majority of master’s graduates were able to find employment within 12 months of graduation (62%). This is consistent with the 2009 data.
Similar to the 2009 findings, the most common way that graduates found employment was through a colleague or friend (40%) as opposed to a web-based job posting (28%) or a non-web-based job posting (8%). Generally, the frequency of web-based job postings leading to employment increased from 2009 while non-web-based decreased.

WHERE DO MAs WORK (EMPLOYMENT SECTOR)?

Slightly more than one third (37%) of participants work in academia (college, community college, and/or university). Consulting firms (15%), Government (13% Federal, 10% State/Local) and Nonprofit organizations (12%) also account for many anthropology graduates.

Key Findings – Master’s Views on Professional Organizations

Between 2009 and 2019, the percentage of respondents belonging to at least one national anthropological professional organization remained consistent at two thirds. The American Anthropological Association (AAA) was the most frequently selected, followed by the Society for American Archaeology (SAA) and the Society for Applied Anthropology (SfAA).
Professional organizations at both national, regional, and local levels only fully meet the needs of a little more than a third (37%) of respondents. Respondents noted that while they appreciated networking opportunities, there were not enough opportunities to do so throughout the year. The ability to present at conferences seemed the largest benefit of membership. The high cost of membership, as noted in 2009, is still a barrier to many.
Generally speaking, anthropologists working as practicing anthropologists find national anthropological organizations less relevant than those working within academia. In particular, respondents felt that the AAA does not recognize the specific needs of practicing and applied anthropologists.
Networking of various kinds was the main reason why participants would want to join a professional organization, followed by continuing education/keeping up with current trends and knowledge in the field.

View the full report

View the Presentation Video